Results showed that total CFP was lower than can be reported in the literature, as NorFor do not include emissions from heifers, electricity used in the production and manure emissions.
The addition of maize silage to the “Maize” ration had low impact to the CFP, as higher maize silage reduced methane emissions but the need of inclusion of protein supplements increased CFP, resulting in a low reduction of total CFP. Similar results were obtained in the “Forage” ration.
The “Byproduct” ration markedly reduced total CFP, due to lower CFP value for these feeds. However, the availability of by-products is limited in comparison of the whole dairy sector need of feed supply.
The “Fat” ration resulted in lower total CPF due to lower methane emissions which is an effect of lower ration intake (higher concentration of energy on the ration). However, the price of this ration should be taken into consideration.
The NorFor model now includes a `Carbon Footprint Calculator` making possible the optimization of the ration in terms of nutrition, health, economy and environment. Hence, a NorFor feed ration now can also present the impact of greenhouse gas emissions for its users.
References
Nielsen, N.I. 2019. Estimating and optimizing carbon footprint of milk in NorFor. In Proceedings Nordic feed Science Conference. SLU, Uppsala, Sweden, p. 57-61.
Mogensen, L., Knudsen, M.T., Dorca-Preda, T., Nielsen, N.I., Kristensen, I.S., & Kristensen, T. 2018. Bæredygtighedsparametre for konventionelle fodermidler til kvæg. DCA-rapport nr. 116. Aarhus University, 129 pp.